A Partial Answer to the Question Posed by David A. Hughes, PhD, in the Article: “What is in the so-called COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity”
Keywords:N1-methylpseudouridine, COVID-19 so-called , modified mRNA as XNA, xenobiological entities, uridine substitutions
In this comment, originally thought of as a “Letter to the Editor”, I want to address the opening question posed by David A. Hughes in the immediately preceding entry in this journal: “What is in the so-called COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’?” The views from under the microscope, ordinary light or electron scanning, all show undisclosed foreign objects that seem to activate themselves and aggregate into complexes that disrupt blood flow in all organ systems. With the spectral analysis using electron microscopy it is possible to determine the specific elements and relative quantities of the elements in those foreign entities. In this comment, I want to focus on the absence of certain elements that are universally present in the proteins of naturally occurring life forms from humans right down to bacteria and even the proteins formed from viruses. What is missing from the spectral analyses of the foreign elements in the main COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna for certain, and probably also missing from the other experimental products being widely distributed that are known to contain foreign aggregates of strange materials similar to those found in the Moderna and Pfizer injections, are the elements nitrogen and phosphorous. This is revealing because all natural DNA, RNA, and their protein products contain those missing elements. Nitrogen for protein synthesis and phosphorus for DNA, RNA, and energy transfer. Therefore, their absence from the foreign structures seen under many different microscopes in all of the COVID-19 so-called “vaccines” that have been examined, and also found in blood samples of persons injected with the Moderna and Pfizer concoctions, proves that these intentionally manufactured self-assembling components, built mainly from carbon-based materials used in computing and super-conductors, are connected with the avant-guard evolutionary theory and experimentation with what is known as XNA, Xeno (Greek for “foreign”), Nucleic Acid. Most of the relevant information is behind significant paywalls in esoteric journals specializing in this peculiar branch of highly theoretical and experimental chemistry. To leap to the bottom-line of my urgent comment on the Hughes’ paper, the edgy modified mRNA with N1-methylpseudouridine (Ψ) replacing the naturally occurring RNA nucleotide uridine (U) at least 728 times in each one of the 30 billion mRNA molecules in each of the Pfizer injections is an exmplary XNA. In this comment I want to explain why the inclusion of such an XNA may be the clue that leads to the unraveling of the already devastating and potentially exterminating impact of the ongoing COVID-19 experiment on the human race.
Aldén, M., Olofsson Falla, F., Yang, D., Barghouth, M., Luan, C., Rasmussen, M., & De Marinis, Y. (2022). Intracellular reverse transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in vitro in human liver cell line. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 44(3), 1115–1126. https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm?s=09
Chaput, J. C., & Herdewijn, P. (2019). What Is XNA? Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 58(34), 11570–11572. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201905999
Duffy, K., Arangundy-Franklin, S., & Holliger, P. (2020a). Modified nucleic acids: Replication, evolution, and next-generation therapeutics. BMC Biology, 18(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00803-6
Duffy, K., Arangundy-Franklin, S., & Holliger, P. (2020b). Modified nucleic acids: Replication, evolution, and next-generation therapeutics. BMC Biology, 18(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00803-6
Eyler, D. E., Franco, M. K., Batool, Z., Wu, M. Z., Dubuke, M. L., Dobosz-Bartoszek, M., Jones, J. D., Polikanov, Y. S., Roy, B., & Koutmou, K. S. (2019). Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(46), 23068–23074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821754116
Fecht, S. (2012, April 19). XNA: Synthetic DNA That Can Evolve. Popular Mechanics. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/genetics/xna-synthetic-dna-that-can-evolve-8210483
Kyrie, V., & Broudy, D. (2022). Cyborgs R Us: The Bio-Nano Panopticon of Injected Bodies? International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.49
Martinez, N. M., & Gilbert, W. V. (2018). Pre-mRNA modifications and their role in nuclear processing. Quantitative Biology, 6(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-018-0147-4
Martinez, N. M., Su, A., Burns, M. C., Nussbacher, J. K., Schaening, C., Sathe, S., Yeo, G. W., & Gilbert, W. V. (2022). Pseudouridine synthases modify human pre-mRNA co-transcriptionally and affect pre-mRNA processing. Molecular Cell, 82(3), 645-659.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.023
Nance, K. D., & Meier, J. L. (2021). Modifications in an Emergency: The Role of N1-Methylpseudouridine in COVID-19 Vaccines. ACS Central Science, 7(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00197
Nie, P., Bai, Y., & Mei, H. (2020). Synthetic Life with Alternative Nucleic Acids as Genetic Materials. Molecules, 25(15), 3483. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153483
Oller, J. W., & Santiago, D. (2022). All cause mortality and COVID-19 injections: Evidence from 28 weeks of Public Health England “COVODovid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Reports.” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.42
Risdon, M. (Director). (2022, April 18). WATCH: Dr. Nagase reviews images from COVID vaccines, shows no “elements of life.” Western Standard. https://rumble.com/v11go0d-watch-dr.-nagase-reviews-images-from-covid-vaccines-shows-no-elements-of-li.html
Smith, C. I. E., & Zain, R. (2019). Therapeutic Oligonucleotides: State of the Art. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 59(1), 605–630. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021050
Vitor B Pinheiro, Taylor, A. I., Cozens, C., Abramov, M., Renders, M., Zhang, S., & John C Chaput. (2012). Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science Vol. 336, No. 6079, 336(6079), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217622
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniel Santiago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright for materials in this journal, IJVTPR, is owned by the author. The author, however, grants first right of publication to the journal, IJVTPR and assures the editorial staff of the journal that the work submitted has not simultaneously been submitted to any other journal, nor is it under consideration for publication by any other journal. If any portion of the work submitted has appeared elsewhere, the quoted material is properly cited and credit is given to the original publisher. The submitting author (or the principal and corresponding author of the work) also assures the editors of IJVTPR that he or she has obtained all required written permissions from any quoted authors or publishers of quoted materials. The submitting author also agrees to hold IJVTPR and its editorial staff harmless from any infractions of copyright law that may be discovered at any time in the future in the submitted work. The author assures the editorial staff at IJVTPR that none of the work submitted is plagiarized, and that any recycled or precycled material by the author is identified as such with proper credits in the text to any other parties holding a copyright interest in the quoted material.